|Date:||20/01/2023 18:19:00 UTC|
|Subject:||Concurrent Delay, Causation in Contract Law, and Contributory Negligence|
I have a graduate student who is interested in the problem of concurrent delay in construction contracts. Concurrent delay occurs when there are two or more independent events of delay during the same time period on a construction schedule and each event affects the completion date of the construction project. The complexity arises where each event of delay is caused by a different party to the construction contract – the contractor and the employer. In such cases, the employer may sue the contractor for damages due to delayed performance of the contract, and the contractor may raise as a defense that the employer also contributed to the delay.
Assuming the losses are not too remote (on the Hadley v Baxndale standard), this seems to raise some very interesting issues surrounding causation in the law of contract and perhaps arguments surrounding something like contributory negligence. If any knows of any interesting discussions of concurrent delay, causation in contract or contributory negligence (or anything which you think related) I would be very much interested in knowing of them. For example, is there any reason to think that the test for causation is or should be different for a breach of contracts case than it is in the law of torts? Similarly, if substitutive damages as well as consequential damages are available for breach of contract does concurrent delay affect their assessment?
Self promotion is encouraged!
Professor of Law
Faculty of Law
Law Building Rm 26
t. 519.661.2111 (x88435)
|You're receiving this message because you're a member of the obligations group from The University of Western Ontario. To take part in this conversation, reply all to this message.|
|View group files | Leave group | Learn more about Microsoft 365 Groups|