|
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:09
From: Jason Neyers
Subject: OBG again
Andrew Dickinson wrote:
Just for completeness - I would argue that in the "tort without loss" scenario, the missing element required for civil actionability is provided by the loss suffered by the claimant, as a sufficiently proximate "victim" of the defendant's conduct.
So Palsgraf is wrongly decided?
--
Jason Neyers
January Term Director
Associate Professor of Law
Faculty of Law
University of Western Ontario
N6A 3K7
(519) 661-2111 x. 88435
<<<<
Previous Message ~ Index ~ Next
Message >>>>>
|