From: Matthew Hoyle <MHoyle@oeclaw.co.uk>

Sent: Thursday 24 September 2026 18:35

To: 'Samuel Beswick'; Obligations

Subject: RE: Unjust enrichment at the SCC (again)

Thanks Sam - please forgive my lack of French meaning I cannot read the underlying judgments, but I can't tell from the SCC website summary what is the alleged enrichment in this case and why is it said to be unjust/unjustified?

Matthew Hoyle

Barrister

One Essex Court

This message is confidential and may be privileged. If you believe you have received it in error please delete it immediately and inform the sender.

Regulated by the Bar Standards Board.

From: Samuel Beswick <sbeswick@sjd.law.harvard.edu>
Sent: 24 September 2026 18:24
To: Obligations <obligations@uwo.ca>
Subject: Unjust enrichment at the SCC (again)

Dear ODGers,

Today, the Supreme Court of Canada granted leave to hear an appeal from a Québec Court of Appeal case, Manon Tanguay v. Kathleen Zicat. The issues are: 

• Whether existence of community of life agreement between de facto spouses, regardless of its scope and content, constitutes in se bar to action for unjust enrichment 
• Whether Quebec Court of Appeal erred in laying down principle that de facto spouses who sign community of life agreement must explicitly include therein possibility for them to bring action for unjust enrichment or else they are deemed to have waived this action in advance (establishment of need for inclusion rather than exclusion of right/action) 
• Whether bringing of action for unjust enrichment can be validly waived contractually and in advance in spousal context; if so, guidelines pursuant to which such waiver may constitute justification for enrichment of one spouse and/or for impoverishment of other spouse  

Although it comes from Canada's civil law jurisdiction, it will presumably be an occasion on which the SCC will revisit Moore v Sweet and Kerr v Baranow. One to watch. 

Best,

Sam

Samuel Beswick

Associate Professor, Allard Law

Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast, a leader in email security and cyber resilience. Mimecast integrates email defenses with brand protection, security awareness training, web security, compliance and other essential capabilities. Mimecast helps protect large and small organizations from malicious activity, human error and technology failure; and to lead the movement toward building a more resilient world. To find out more, visit our website.