From: | Enrichment - Restitution & Unjust Enrichment Legal Issues <ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA> |
To: | ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA |
Date: | 01/02/2010 23:00:14 UTC |
Subject: | [RDG] Kolmar Group AG v Traxpo Enterprises PVT Ltd [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm) (01 February 2010) |
The above English case resulted in a plea of economic duress being upheld. There is little elucidation of the elements of the plea, but it is interesting that Christopher Clarke J upheld the overpayment as recoverable in the alternative in tort as damages for intimidation.
====
This message was delivered through the Restitution Discussion Group,
an international internet LISTSERV devoted to all aspects of the law
of unjust enrichment. To subscribe, send "subscribe enrichment" in
the body of a message to <listserv@lists.mcgill.ca>. To unsubscribe,
send "signoff enrichment" to the same address. To make a posting to
all group members, send to <enrichment@lists.mcgill.ca>. The list is
run by Lionel Smith of McGill University, <lionel.smith@mcgill.ca>.