From: Enrichment - Restitution & Unjust Enrichment Legal Issues <ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
To: ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA
Date: 17/11/2011 10:51:32 UTC
Subject: Re: [RDG] Passengers 'told to buy fuel'

Recovery as damages for breach of contract?

This will probably not work for passengers who did not book their flight - which includes all business travellers whose ticket was booked by their company.

Gerhard Dannemann

Am 17.11.2011 11:41, schrieb Henry Forbes Smith:

Surely this is solved by contract. And if a passenger was on board without a contract or enforceable bargain, then they could not recover (a) if they paid, because a ticket to Vienna no doubt costs as much (or more) as a ticket to London, and (b) if they did not pay, because why should they get any further?

 

Of course there are permutations by which the contract may fail but English law may respect the underlying bargain. I assume, however, that many systems of law call this contract.

 

If the passengers were asked to pay in the air rather than Vienna, I agree it would be a warning not a threat, but the airline would presumably have gotten itself under some duty (of I know not what kind) to salvage the situation, so it would (almost) be necessary discharge of another’s obligation, and recoverable.

 

Henry

 

From: Enrichment - Restitution & Unjust Enrichment Legal Issues [mailto:ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA] On Behalf Of Gerhard Dannemann
Sent: 17 November 2011 08:20
To: ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA
Subject: [RDG] Passengers 'told to buy fuel'

 

See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-15762127

I am wondering whether English law allows those passengers to recover in unjust enrichment. Applying Williams v Roffey Bros & Nichols (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1 (CA), this may have been a warning rather than a threat, and thus not a case of compulsion.

Any views?

Gerhard Dannemann



-- 
Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dannemann
Centre for British Studies
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Mohrenstr. 60
10117 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 2093 99048
Fax  +49 30 2093 99055
http://www.gbz.hu-berlin.de


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________

====

This message was delivered through the Restitution Discussion Group, an international internet LISTSERV devoted to all aspects of the law of unjust enrichment. To subscribe, send "subscribe enrichment" in the body of a message to <listserv@lists.mcgill.ca>. To unsubscribe, send "signoff enrichment" to the same address. To make a posting to all group members, send to <enrichment@lists.mcgill.ca>. The list is run by Lionel Smith of McGill University, <lionel.smith@mcgill.ca>.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________

-- 
Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dannemann
Centre for British Studies
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Mohrenstr. 60
10117 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 2093 99048
Fax +49 30 2093 99055
http://www.gbz.hu-berlin.de
====

This message was delivered through the Restitution Discussion Group, an international internet LISTSERV devoted to all aspects of the law of unjust enrichment. To subscribe, send "subscribe enrichment" in the body of a message to <listserv@lists.mcgill.ca>. To unsubscribe, send "signoff enrichment" to the same address. To make a posting to all group members, send to <enrichment@lists.mcgill.ca>. The list is run by Lionel Smith of McGill University, <lionel.smith@mcgill.ca>.