| From: | Enrichment - Restitution & Unjust Enrichment Legal Issues <ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA> |
| To: | ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA |
| Date: | 02/01/2012 21:39:22 UTC |
| Subject: | [RDG] Restatement of Restitution, Washington and Lee symposium |
Happy New Year Enrichment
As you know Restatement (Third) Restitution and Unjust Enrichment (2011) was published to great acclaim last year.
The first professional commentary on the final Restatement is the Washington and Lee Law Review’s Restitution Rollout symposium which was published last month. A copy of the table of contents is below.
The publication of R3RUE was a significant international event that exposed a dozen-year American Law Institute project to the curiosity and candor of the profession. Our Restitution Rollout symposium authors include leading United States scholars like Joe Perillo. The symposium has a transnational quality. Justice W.M.C. Gummow of the Australian High Court contributed an article as did leading United Kingdom and Canadian scholars David Campbell, University of Leeds, Lionel Smith, McGill University, and Tony Duggin, University of Toronto.
The individual articles are available in legal databases. Direct inquiries about the issue to Lisa Gearheart at the law review, lgearheart@wlu.edu.
Doug Rendleman
WASHINGTON AND LEE
LAW REVIEW
Volume 68 | Summer 2011 | Number 3 |
RESTITUTION rOLLOUT: tHE rESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF rESTITUTION & uNJUST eNRICHMENT
Introduction 865
Brandon Hasbrouck
Three Restatements of Restitution 867
Andrew Kull
Moses v. Macferlan 250 Years On 881
The Honourable Justice W.M.C. Gummow
The Restatement (Third) of Restitution & 899
Unjust Enrichment: Some Introductory
Suggestions
Michael Traynor
Intent to Charge for Unsolicited Benefits 911
Conferred in an Emergency: A Case Study in
The Meaning of "Unjust" in the Restatement
(Third) of Restitution & Unjust Enrichment
Louis E. Wolcher
Unjust Impoverishment: Using Restitution 949
Reasoning in Today’s Mortgage Crisis
Peter Linzer
Donna L. Huffman
Measurement of Restitution: Coordinating 973
Restitution with Compensatory Damages
and Punitive Damages
Doug Rendleman
Restitution in a Contractual Context and the 1007
Restatement (Third) of Restitution &
Unjust Enrichment
Joseph M. Perillo
The Restitution Revival and the Ghosts 1027
of Equity
Caprice L. Roberts
A Relational Critique of the Third 1063
Restatement of Restitution § 39
David Campbell
After Frustration: Three Cheers for 1133
Chandler v. Webster
Victor P. Goldberg
Beyond Ex Post Expediency—An Ex Ante 1171
View of Rescission and Restitution,
Richard R.W. Brooks Alexander Stremitzer
Common Law and Equity in R3RUE 1185
Lionel Smith
A Sin of Admission: Why Section 62 Should 1203
Have Been Omitted from the Restatement
(Third) of Restitution & Unjust Enrichment
Adam Rigoni
Proprietary Remedies in Insolvency: A 1229
Comparison of the Restatement (Third) of
Restitution & Unjust Enrichment with
English and Commonwealth Law
Anthony Duggan
Counter-Restitution for Monetary Remedies 1271
in Equity
George P. Roach
Translocations and Inertia 1335
W.F. Young
BP Oil Spill: Compensation, Agency Costs, 1341
and Restitution
David F. Partlett
Russell L. Weaver
Indeterminacy and the Law of Restitution 1377
James Steven Rogers
Cohabitation and the Restatement (Third) of 1407
Restitution & Unjust Enrichment
Candace Saari Kovacic-Fleischer
NOTES
When the Bezzle Bursts: Restitutionary 1589
Distribution of Assets After Ponzi
Schemes Enter Bankruptcy
Mallory A. Sullivan
This message was delivered through the Restitution Discussion Group, an international internet LISTSERV devoted to all aspects of the law of unjust enrichment. To subscribe, send "subscribe enrichment" in the body of a message to <listserv@lists.mcgill.ca>. To unsubscribe, send "signoff enrichment" to the same address. To make a posting to all group members, send to <enrichment@lists.mcgill.ca>. The list is run by Lionel Smith of McGill University, <lionel.smith@mcgill.ca>.