From: Enrichment - Restitution & Unjust Enrichment Legal Issues <ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
To: ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA
Date: 10/07/2013 08:55:33 UTC
Subject: [RDG]
Attachments: [2013] SGCA 36.pdf
Dear Colleagues

I am circulating an important and interesting new decision by the Singapore CA which discusses the nature of claims in UE, the interplay between UE and unconscionability, the interplay between UE and knowing receipt, and the test to determine when a benefit has been acquired at a claimant's expense.

Happy reading!
Charles

_______________________________________________________

Professor Charles Mitchell
Faculty of Laws
University College London
Bentham House
Endsleigh Gardens
LONDON WC1H 0EG

+ 44 20 7679 4517

====

This message was delivered through the Restitution Discussion Group, an international internet LISTSERV devoted to all aspects of the law of unjust enrichment. To subscribe, send "subscribe enrichment" in the body of a message to <listserv@lists.mcgill.ca>. To unsubscribe, send "signoff enrichment" to the same address. To make a posting to all group members, send to <enrichment@lists.mcgill.ca>. The list is run by Lionel Smith of McGill University, <lionel.smith@mcgill.ca>.