Thanks to Peter for drawing our attention to the decision. Here is a link to the case - http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2013/2210.html
It is, I think, the first application of the Supreme Court's observations in Pitt v Holt/Futter v Futter
Best wishes,
James

--
James Lee
Lecturer and Director of Careers
Academic Fellow of the Inner Temple
Birmingham Law School, room 235
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT, United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0)121 414 3629
E-mail: j.s.f.lee@bham.ac.uk<mailto:j.s.f.lee@bham.ac.uk><mailto:j.s.f.lee@bham.ac.uk>


Web: http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/law/lee-james.aspx

Sent from my iPad

On 24 Jul 2013, at 22:45, "Peter Watts (Law)" <pg.watts@AUCKLAND.AC.NZ<mailto:pg.watts@AUCKLAND.AC.NZ>> wrote:

The above is an interesting little case on alleged mistaken gifts. Peter.
====

This message was delivered through the Restitution Discussion Group, an international internet LISTSERV devoted to all aspects of the law of unjust enrichment. To subscribe, send "subscribe enrichment" in the body of a message to <listserv@lists.mcgill.ca<mailto:listserv@lists.mcgill.ca>>. To unsubscribe, send "signoff enrichment" to the same address. To make a posting to all group members, send to <enrichment@lists.mcgill.ca<mailto:enrichment@lists.mcgill.ca>>. The list is run by Lionel Smith of McGill University, <lionel.smith@mcgill.ca<mailto:lionel.smith@mcgill.ca>>.

====

This message was delivered through the Restitution Discussion Group,
an international internet LISTSERV devoted to all aspects of the law
of unjust enrichment. To subscribe, send "subscribe enrichment" in
the body of a message to <listserv@lists.mcgill.ca>. To unsubscribe,
send "signoff enrichment" to the same address. To make a posting to
all group members, send to <enrichment@lists.mcgill.ca>. The list is
run by Lionel Smith of McGill University, <lionel.smith@mcgill.ca>.