From: | Enrichment - Restitution & Unjust Enrichment Legal Issues <ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA> |
To: | ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA |
Date: | 30/01/2013 10:22:39 UTC |
Subject: | [RDG] New CA case on constructive trust |
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in FHR European Ventures LLP v Mankarious
[2013] EWCA Civ 17. http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/17.html
The question at issue was whether a secret commission paid to an agent was held by the agent on constructive trust for the principal. The CA, applying one of the two exceptions to the ‘personal remedy only’ general rule laid down in
Sinclair v Versailles, decided (overturning Simon J) that the secret commission was held on constructive trust. The short judgment of Etherton LJ (now The Chancellor) is particularly interesting in its examination of constructive trusts generally
(albeit that he considers that it is for the Supreme Court, not the Court of Appeal, to sort out the many difficulties).
Andrew Burrows
Professor Andrew Burrows QC, FBA,
Professor of the Law of England,
All Souls College,
Oxford,
OX1 4AL
This message was delivered through the Restitution Discussion Group, an international internet LISTSERV devoted to all aspects of the law of unjust enrichment. To subscribe, send "subscribe enrichment" in the body of a message to <listserv@lists.mcgill.ca>. To unsubscribe, send "signoff enrichment" to the same address. To make a posting to all group members, send to <enrichment@lists.mcgill.ca>. The list is run by Lionel Smith of McGill University, <lionel.smith@mcgill.ca>.