From: Enrichment - Restitution & Unjust Enrichment Legal Issues <ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
To: ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA
Date: 28/03/2014 12:30:29 UTC
Subject: [RDG] <no subject>
Not one, but two decisions of major importance for UE lawyers have been handed down today: Henderson J's magisterial decision in Littlewoods, and the CA's affirmation of Sales J's decision in Relfo. The former traverses many issues, including subjective devaluation and counterfactual denials of enrichment; the latter treats claims against remote recipients, a topic that was also central to the CA's decision in Menelaou, permission to appeal from which has now been granted by the SC. Enjoy! CM

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2014/868.html

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2014/360.html

http://selbornechambers.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/0175_001-2.pdf

___________________________________________

Professor Charles Mitchell
Faculty Vice-Dean (Staffing) / Head of Law Department
Faculty of Laws
University College London
Bentham House
Endsleigh Gardens
LONDON WC1H 0EG

tel: +44 (0)20 7679 4517


PA Helena Zara
email: h.zara@ucl.ac.uk
tel + 44 (0)20 7679 1412





====

This message was delivered through the Restitution Discussion Group, an international internet LISTSERV devoted to all aspects of the law of unjust enrichment. To subscribe, send "subscribe enrichment" in the body of a message to <listserv@lists.mcgill.ca>. To unsubscribe, send "signoff enrichment" to the same address. To make a posting to all group members, send to <enrichment@lists.mcgill.ca>. The list is run by Lionel Smith of McGill University, <lionel.smith@mcgill.ca>.