From: Enrichment - Restitution & Unjust Enrichment Legal Issues <ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA>
To: ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA
Date: 28/03/2014 16:03:33 UTC
Subject: [RDG] <no subject>
It never rains but it pours. Also released by the CA today is Harrison v Madejski, which is extraordinarily similar to Cressman v Coys of Kensington: the same move made by D to register himself as the new owner of a personalised plate that was not included in the sale of C's car by the same car dealer, the same rejection by the court of D's subjective devaluation argument for the same reasons as those given by Mance LJ in Cressman. Also of note: the costs of the litigation are £300K, ten times the value of the claim. CM

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2014/361.html


___________________________________________

Professor Charles Mitchell
Faculty Vice-Dean (Staffing) / Head of Law Department
Faculty of Laws
University College London
Bentham House
Endsleigh Gardens
LONDON WC1H 0EG

tel: +44 (0)20 7679 4517


PA Helena Zara
email: h.zara@ucl.ac.uk
tel + 44 (0)20 7679 1412




====

This message was delivered through the Restitution Discussion Group, an international internet LISTSERV devoted to all aspects of the law of unjust enrichment. To subscribe, send "subscribe enrichment" in the body of a message to <listserv@lists.mcgill.ca>. To unsubscribe, send "signoff enrichment" to the same address. To make a posting to all group members, send to <enrichment@lists.mcgill.ca>. The list is run by Lionel Smith of McGill University, <lionel.smith@mcgill.ca>.