From: | Enrichment - Restitution & Unjust Enrichment Legal Issues <ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA> |
To: | ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA |
Date: | 14/10/2019 14:42:44 UTC |
Subject: | [RDG] unjust enrichment |
Subscribers to Private Law Theory will have seen that Andy Burrows has published “In Defence of Unjust Enrichment” in the Cambridge Law Journal.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-law-journal/article/in-defence-of-unjust-enrichment/C970C0D3C39D330894A0258C2B91DD3D# (subscription required)
The paper aims to defend the view that unjust enrichment is a single cause of action rather than a collection of multiple liability principles.
More circumspect is a speech of Hon. Susan Glazebrook of the NZSC, entitled “Unjust enrichment: the platypus of private law”, delivered in 2018, which can be found here: https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/publications/speeches-and-papers
You need to scroll down a bit. I did not include the direct link because, at least on my browser, it downloads the speech and I did not think it was polite to put such a link directly in a posting.
Happy Thanksgiving to Canadian list members,
LDS