Further to the posit of Lionel Smith, in the drawing

of a distinction between the lawyer and the moral philosopher,

in the posit of an unacceptability by a lawyer of moral inquiry

in the law in consequence of the posited presence of rules 

which necessitate the rationalization of the law beyond the

domain of moral philosophy (Smith, Lionel, Unjust

Enrichment), I ask: why can a foundation of morality of the

rules of the law which a lawyer must apply not be existent?

Robert MacKenzie