Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
Lionel Smith
Date:
Sun, 25 Feb 1996 22:36:23 -0700
Re:
Corrective Justice

 

On 26 Feb, Mitchell McInnes wrote:

It occasionally is said that the law of restitution (at least in the subtractive enrichment sense) is based upon a notion of corrective justice. The issue was explored in Barker, "Unjust Enrichment: Containing the Beast" (1995) 15 OJLS 457. Does anyone know of additional citations or have any thoughts on the matter? Specifically, I am interested in the issue as it pertains to the second element of the principle of unjust enrichment ("at the plaintiff's expense").

This is the first time I have had the pleasure of responding to an email before it was sent. Such is the time difference between Melbourne and Edmonton.

You might want to take a look at "Corrective Justice and Wrongful Gain," Chapter 8 in Jules Coleman, Markets, Morals and the Law (CUP, 1988).

 

Lionel Smith
Faculty of Law, University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H5
Tel 403 492 2599; Fax 403 492 4924


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !