![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
On 26 Feb, Mitchell
McInnes wrote:
It occasionally is said that the law of restitution
(at least in the subtractive enrichment sense) is based upon a notion
of corrective justice. The issue was explored in Barker, "Unjust Enrichment:
Containing the Beast" (1995) 15 OJLS 457. Does anyone know of additional
citations or have any thoughts on the matter? Specifically, I am interested
in the issue as it pertains to the second element of the principle of
unjust enrichment ("at the plaintiff's expense"). This is the first time I have had the pleasure of responding
to an email before it was sent. Such is the time difference between Melbourne
and Edmonton.
You might want to take a look at "Corrective Justice
and Wrongful Gain," Chapter 8 in Jules Coleman, Markets, Morals and
the Law (CUP, 1988).
Lionel Smith <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |