U.S. cases in 1995 (Andrew Kull, 5 Mar 1996)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Andrew Kull
Date:	Tue, 5 Mar 1996 11:49:26 -0500 (EST)
Re:	U.S. cases in 1995

As "US Regional Editor" of the Restitution Law Review, I should be extremely grateful to receive the citation of what any recipient considers a noteworthy 1995 decision in restitution in a U.S. court.

(The fact that almost no one subscribes to the Restitution mailing list from a U.S. address is not unrelated to the difficulty of locating U.S. restitution cases by ordinary means. The difficulty is compounded by the reluctance of U.S. law professors of any persuasion to read current judicial decisions. But I make this request on the off-chance that you may have noticed some interesting U.S. development.)

All suggestions gratefully received. Thanks for your help.

Andrew Kull

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.