Accessory liability (Robert Chambers, 9 May 1996)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Robert Chambers
Date:	Thu, 9 May 1996 17:59:07 +1000
Re:	Accessory liability

Further to my question re Warman v Dwyer, Michael Bryan has kindly pointed out that Ford & Lee, Principles of the Law of Trusts, 2d ed, para 2222.1 and Scott on Trusts, para 506, say that third-party participants in a fiduciary's breach of duty are liable to account for profits they make thereby.

Robert Chambers
U Melbourne Law School

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.