Involuntary subrogation (Lionel Smith, 11 Apr 1997)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Lionel Smith
Date:	Fri, 11 Apr 1997 17:31:58
Re:	involuntary subrogation

My apologies to all; whether you wanted it or not you got a copy of the Commercial Union case.

I have warned people before about taking care with the Reply function in the context of the list since, in the case of a message which came through the list, it may (depending on your mailer) set up a message back to (all members of) the list rather than to the individual. I have just make this mistake. This is what the internet techs call a waste of bandwidth.

Sorry,

Lionel

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.