![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
Reluctant
as I am to utter (once again !) the immortal words "There is an Irish case
...", nonetheless, I want to mention not one, but three, in the context
of Taylor v. Dickens.
First, the Taylor v. Dickens tendency to miss
relevant restitutionary remedies and to claim only in contract is alive
and well and living in Ireland (see, eg, Jobling-Purser v. Jackman
(High Court, unreported, 12 January 1995, Costello P) [1995] R.L.R. s.210).
Second, nevertheless, there is an Irish case, in which
the plaintiff sought not a quantum meruit (which was statute barred) but
a constructive trust (which was not). It is Reidy v McGreevy
(High Court, unreported, 19 March 1993, Barron J) [1994] R.L.R. s.183.
Third, it seems to me that the judgment in Taylor
v. Dickens - as reported in the Times - takes a very narrow view
of proprietary estoppel. By contrast, and on facts in which a nephew worked
on the deceased uncle's farm, the Irish Supreme Court seems to have taken
an extraordinarily generous view of that doctrine in the nephew's favour,
in McCarron v. McCarron (Supreme Court, unreported, 13 February
1997) {1997] R.L.R. s.?* (compare a less nuanced but similarly generous
view of the doctrine in Smyth v. Halpin (Irish Times Law Report
31 March 1997 (H.Ct., Geoghegan J.)) [1997] R.L.R. s.?*). It seems to
me that Irish empiricism (or simply bad judicial craft) is proving excellent
soil in which to plant portable palm trees - provided they can handle
the rain (on which see Mee "Palm Trees in the Rain - New Model Constructive
Trusts in Ireland" (1996) 1 Conveyancing and Property Law Journal 9 -
quite properly critical of the imposition of constructive trusts without
justification in principle).
(* The reason why I cannot give a section number to the
1997 RLR is that, though a contributor, I have yet to receive a copy,
but notes on both cases should be in the Ireland chapter of the 1997 Review;
copies of these or any other Irish material always available; if you are
interested, you only have to ask me, (though I am such an inefficient
correspondent you may have to wait a while !)).
Eoin.
EOIN O'DELL <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |