Barclays: the suing bank (Andrew Tettenborn, 17 Dec 1997)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Andrew Tettenborn
Date:	Wed, 17 Dec 1997 10:04:47
Re:	Barclays: the suing bank

Eoin has, as usual, hit the nail on the head. O'Brien is a contract / property case (property because it deals with the validity of the creation of a security interest, as well as the validity of a personal covenant to repay). Once the mortgage/covenant has been successfully impugned, there may of course be restitutionary consequences (e.g. return of any benefits obtained by the person seeking to set aside the transaction): but that is an entirely different matter.

Andrew Tettenborn
University of Exeter.

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.