![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
Peter Birks notes
that the Polly Peck decision
ought to be cross-referenced to FORTEX GROUP
LTD V MACINTOSH NZ CA (FIVE JUDGES) 30 MCH 1998, which also refuses to
use the remedial constructive trust to disturb the law of insolvency as
it has been known and used. If anyone knows of a good web site for NZ decisions,
I would be glad to have it.
Lionel
<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |