Bank overcharging customers ("Colin, Lisa and the Cat", 5 Aug 1998)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Colin Riegels
Date:	Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:05:41 +0100
Re:	Bank overcharging customers

Presumably the bank's treatment of its customers was a breach of its contracts with them.

Actions to recover the customers' lost money are therefore actions for breach of contract, or perhaps even (depending on the circumstances) actions for debts based on the contracts, if that is different.

That must be correct. The unstated dream of certain academics to reduce the entire two volumes of Chitty into one small chapter in Goff & Jones entitled "Quasi-restitution" has not yet come to fruition.

COLIN RIEGELS
Barrister
One Paper Buildings
Temple,
London EC4Y 7EP

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.