Clayton's Case (Lionel Smith, 14 Oct 1998)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Lionel Smith
Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:24:09
Re:	Clayton's Case

In Keefe v. Law Society of New South Wales, 10 Sep 1998, at ‹http://www.austlii.edu.au/ au/cases/nsw/supreme_ct/ 1998/395.html›, the NSW CA has added its voice to the emerging view that Clayton's Case has nothing to do with tracing. The case is mostly about professional misconduct (as so many tracing cases are ...)

Lionel

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.