Supreme Court of Canada and Unconstitutional Taxes (Duncan Sheehan, 28 Oct 1998)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Duncan Sheehan
Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 1998 19:22:01
Re:	Supreme Court of Canada and Unconstitutional Taxes

Dear All

Even if Air Canada v British Columbia did not abolish the distinction between mistakes of law and those of fact in Canada it seems highly unlikely, even after a bit of pedantic head counting (Lionel Smith's words not mine) that anybody is seriously going to take that and run with it in Canada. If they do they are going to get short shrift rather quickly, I suspect.

Duncan Sheehan

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.