Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
Lionel Smith
Date:
Tue, 16 Feb 1999 16:28:34
Re:
Retention of Title in Contracts of Sale of Goods

 

Please may I have the citation of any case (decided in a Commonwealth jurisdiction under the Sale of Goods Act 1893 [U.K.], or its local equivalent current at the time of the decision, or at common law, or in equity) on a buyer's claim to recover money paid on account of the price of goods which, pursuant to a "Romalpa clause", had themselves been recovered by the seller after their delivery to the buyer.

The closest thing I can think of are the comments of Goff LJ (AHTW) in Clough Mill Ltd. v. Martin [1985] 1 WLR 111 at 117A-118E, suggesting that in such a case there is a claim in unjust enrichment based on failure of consideration, even though the plaintiff/buyer was the one who breached the contract. & see Donaldson MR at 125H-126B, trying to do the same thing by interpretation of the contract, which however is difficult if the breach was one which allowed termination by the seller.

 

Lionel


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !