|
|
Restitution
front page
What's
new?
Archive
front page
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2007 2006 2008
2009
|
|
|
<== Previous message Back
to index Next
message ==>
Sender: |
Lionel
Smith |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Apr 1999 11:47:34 |
Re: |
broadcast + plea |
Thanks to Peter
Birks for broadcasting in my absence. Here is a new broadcast:
March/April Conveyancer:
David Wright, "The Rise of Non-Consensual Subrogation" [1999] Conv 113
M.P. Thompson, "Redefining O'Brien" (note on Royal Bank of Scotland v.
Etridge (No 2)) [1999] Conv 126
March Cambridge Law Journal:
Steve Hedley, "Restitution-Mistake of Law-Reform in Haste, Repent at Leisure"
(note on KB v. Lincoln) [1999] CLJ 21
Stuart Bridge, "The Aftermath of O'Brien: Carte Blanche for Banks, Cartes
Jaunes for Solicitors?" (note on Royal Bank of Scotland v. Etridge (No
2)) [1999] CLJ 28
Peter Schlectreim, Review, Markesinis, Lorenz & Dannemann, The German
Law of Obligations, vol 1, Contracts and Restitution [1999] CLJ 236
Andrew Tettenborn, Review, Burrows, Understanding the Law of Obligations:
Essays on Contract, Tort and Restitution [1999] CLJ 243
G.J. Tolhurst, Review, Rose ed., Restitution and Banking Law [1999] CLJ
246
Plea: I usually get the core English law journals across my desk. Others
I do not see unless I go and find them. I hope that everyone on the list
will take the initiative to post the appearance of articles which they
see in other journals (or indeed in those). This way all of us can find
out about developments in the literature which we might otherwise miss.
If you have not seen it posted, you can be sure that there are many on
the RDG who do not know about it and would like to. At last count we are
231.
Lionel
<== Previous message Back
to index Next
message ==>
" These messages
are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice,
to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very
few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly
not this one. Have a nice day! "
|