Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
Lionel Smith
Date:
Tue, 27 Apr 1999 11:47:34
Re:
broadcast + plea

 

Thanks to Peter Birks for broadcasting in my absence. Here is a new broadcast:

March/April Conveyancer:
David Wright, "The Rise of Non-Consensual Subrogation" [1999] Conv 113
M.P. Thompson, "Redefining O'Brien" (note on Royal Bank of Scotland v. Etridge (No 2)) [1999] Conv 126

March Cambridge Law Journal:
Steve Hedley, "Restitution-Mistake of Law-Reform in Haste, Repent at Leisure" (note on KB v. Lincoln) [1999] CLJ 21
Stuart Bridge, "The Aftermath of O'Brien: Carte Blanche for Banks, Cartes Jaunes for Solicitors?" (note on Royal Bank of Scotland v. Etridge (No 2)) [1999] CLJ 28
Peter Schlectreim, Review, Markesinis, Lorenz & Dannemann, The German Law of Obligations, vol 1, Contracts and Restitution [1999] CLJ 236
Andrew Tettenborn, Review, Burrows, Understanding the Law of Obligations: Essays on Contract, Tort and Restitution [1999] CLJ 243
G.J. Tolhurst, Review, Rose ed., Restitution and Banking Law [1999] CLJ 246

Plea: I usually get the core English law journals across my desk. Others I do not see unless I go and find them. I hope that everyone on the list will take the initiative to post the appearance of articles which they see in other journals (or indeed in those). This way all of us can find out about developments in the literature which we might otherwise miss. If you have not seen it posted, you can be sure that there are many on the RDG who do not know about it and would like to. At last count we are 231.

 

Lionel


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !