Constructive and resulting trusts, tracing (Lionel Smith, 16 Jun 1999)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Lionel Smith
Date:	Wed, 16 Jun 1999 11:37:45 +0100
Re:	Constructive and resulting trusts, tracing

Simon Evans wrote:

Recipient liability: Perhaps one day we will have an authoritative statement of what is required for accessory liability in Australia. (List members may recall that the High Court of Australia declined to take up this question when it refused special leave to appeal in Sixty Fourth Throne Pty Ltd v Macquarie Bank Ltd M101/1997 on 19 May 1998: see the transcript at ‹http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/ hca/transcripts/1997/M101/1.html›.)

Having looked at that transcript, all I can say is that I would not want to argue an application for leave before Gaudron J.

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.