Resulting Trust doctrine (Charles Mitchell, 27 Jul 1999)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Charles Mitchell
Date:	Tue, 27 Jul 1999 12:16:28 +0100
Re:	Resulting Trust doctrine

If the time has come for systems of law as 'well-developed' as our own to do away with fictitious presumptions as a means of determining whether to award subrogation (per Lord Hoffmann in BFC v Parc), the same must also be true of resulting trusts.

Dr Charles Mitchell
Lecturer in Law
School of Law
King's College London
Strand
LONDON WC2R 2LS

tel: 0171 848 2290
fax: 0171 848 2465

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.