Free acceptance, etc (Andrew Tettenborn, 2 Sep 1999)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Andrew Tettenborn
Date:	Thu, 2 Sep 1999 10:51:23 +0100
Re:	Free acceptance, etc

Devotees of the arguments related to free acceptance, incontrovertible benefit, and those who have nothing better to do than stand by watching hopeful window cleaners may like to look at Becerra & Page v Close Bros, Thomas J, 25/6/99. Considerable discussion of the whole area, tho' the claim failed on the facts

Andrew Tettenborn
Bracton Professor of Law

Tel: 01392-263189 / +44-392-263189 (international)
Fax: 01392-263196 / +44-392-263196 (international)

Snailmail:
School of Law,
University of Exeter,
Amory Building,
Rennes Drive,
Exeter EX4 4RJ
England

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.