Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
Lionel Smith
Date:
Thu, 9 Sep 1999 10:12:03
Re:
Judicial Discretion

 

Neil Andrews of Clare College, Cambridge has asked me to disseminate the following information. He is the regional reporter for common law jurisdictions for a conference on "The Discretionary Power of the Judge" in Ghent, 22-25 April 2000. He is seeking national reporters for Ireland, Canada, the US and Australia. The reporter does not need to attend the conference but needs to write a short paper, hopefully by 1 October. There is a framework for the paper below. Anyone who is interested should contact Neil directly at <nha1000@cus.cam.ac.uk>.

 

Lionel

 

what is the nature of judicial discretion? (Why it it a good/bad thing, at least potentially, and what safeguards exist or should exist, in your opinion?)

what is the role of appeal courts to first instance discretion?

how closely do appeal courts scrutinise/moderate first instance exercises of discretion?

is this appellate regulatory approach the same across all types of claim and proceeding?

what are the main foci of judicial discretion (here invent your own typology), but my suggestions are:

 

THE DRAMATIS PERSONAE

selection of judges (judge/judge/jury); one assumes the parties appoint their own counsel

 

COMMENCEMENT AND ACCESS

Discretion can seep in perhaps at the commencement of proceedings: leave/allocation of case to particular level of court etc; limitation rules, eg, do they contain any discretionary elements? the international element, forum non conveniens, and lis alibi pendens

 

PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE

framing of the case and case-management through to trial

discovery/disclosure rules and orders

 

TRIAL AND ENFORCEMENT

conduct of trial: notably sequence of issues; application of evidence (notably hearsay reforms?); selection of remedy;

costs (including any discretion to impose punitive or quasi-punitive costs against parties or lawyers)

enforcement of the judgment.


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !