Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
Lionel Smith
Date:
Fri, 5 Nov 1999 13:51:15
Re:
LQR

 

In the new LQR, Oct 99:

R Williams, note on Dimond v Lovell and Hardwick v Hudson (cases on recovery by a plaintiff in respect of services provided by a 3d party)
S Meier and R Zimmermann, note on KB v Lincoln, observing the potential for a move towards a model of restitution for payments which were not due
P Birks, review of DM Wright, The Remedial Constructive Trust
R Nolan, review of F Rose ed, Restitution and Banking Law

Also lots of other good lawyers' law ...

And for those who have not yet heard, McLachlin J has been appointed the new Chief Justice of Canada (story at <http://www.cbc.ca/cgi-bin/ templates/view.cgi?/news/1999/11/03/ court99 1103>).

 

L


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !