Lord Archer (Matthew Scully, 22 Nov 1999)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Matthew Scully
Date:	Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:06:45 GMT
Re:	Lord Archer

Surely the basis of the case against Lord Archer would be failure of basis. The compensation was paid on foot of a judgment which it is now alleged was wrongfully obtained. If this judgment were to be set aside, then money paid under it would be recoverable for failure of consideration.

Matthew Scully
Oxford Institute of Legal Practice

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.