![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
It is only in the
last few years that 'It is obvious that ...' and 'It is fair that ...' have
made a bid to become respectable arguments among lawyers. The only thing
that is obvious to me is that different people and generations have different
views on the self-evident, that many self-evident truths have turned out
to be false, and some, as we now think, not only false but wicked: 'It is
obvious that the sun goes round the earth.' 'It is obvious that no woman
can enter a learned profession.' 'It is obvious that no jew is fit to hold
a chair in a university.' It is both puzzling and disheartening that a senior
member of Newton's university should rely, militantly, on an argument of
this kind.
In the only modern case that I know in which the matter of repayment
of sums paid under a judgment subsequently reversed was discussed, the
liability to repay when the reversing court had made no order for repayment
was contested all the way to the HCA: Commonwealth v. McCormack (1984)
155 C.L.R. 273. Someone evidently thought the conclusion less than obvious.
Peter B H Birks, QC, DCL, FBA <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |