Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
Lionel Smith
Date:
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 11:17:06
Re:
News

 

It appears that, like most of the rest of the world, the RDG has been spared any Y2K effects. News:

Lowson v Coombes [1999] Ch 373, CA: applying Tinsley: you can establish a purchase money resulting trust against your paramour even though you were trying to hide assets from your wife.

N McBride, "Rescission of Settlement for Mistake and Non-Disclosure" [1999] CLJ 473 (note on BCCI v Ali [1999] 2 All ER 1005)
D Wright, "Giumelli, Estoppel and the New Law of Remedies" [1999] CLJ 476 (note on Giumelli v Giumelli)
G Virgo, "Recent Developments in Restitution of Mistaken Payments" [1999] CLJ 478 (note on Nurdin and Peacock v DB Ramsden and Lloyds Bank v Independent Insurance)
S Worthington, "Fiduciaries: When is Self-Denial Obligatory?" [1999] CLJ 500
GJ Tolhurst, "Assignment, Equities, The Trident Beauty and Restitution" [1999] CLJ 546
S Meier, "Mistaken Payments in Three-Party Situations: A German View of English Law" [1999] CLJ 567

MP Thompson, "Constructive Notice of Undue Influence" [1999] Conv 510 (note on Northern Rock BS v Archer) (NB not Lord Archer)

 

Lionel


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !