![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
Maillist Members
may be interested to learn that the current severe political crisis in Germany
involving the German Christian Democratic Union is closely linked to restitution
law.
Yesterday, the conservative party leader and whip, Wolfgang
Schäuble, announced that he will not stand again in forthcoming elections
to both positions within one day after the president of the German parliament
had announced that he subjects the CDU to a 41 Million DM restitutionary
claim for public funds received during 1999 in violation of the CDU's
duty to submit full financial accounts under §24 Parteiengesetz (Political
Parties Act) on the ground that its branch organisation in Hesse had hidden
away some DM 17 Million in accounts in Liechtenstein.
An English translation of the Political Parties Act is
published in the German Law Archive at: http://iuscomp.org/gla/
statutes/ParteienG.htm
While the restitution claim for DM 41 Million paid out in 1999 follows
from the statute itself (§ 20 subs. 3, § 23 subs. 4), and while
this claim will not bankrupt the party, its future is, to a large degree,
in the hands of the general law of restitution. For it is primarily this
law which will have to decide whether and to which extent the CDU is obliged
to return a few hundred more millions of DM on the ground that this party
has presented similarly false accounts since the early 1980ies - claims
which, if allowed in full, would in all likelihood bankrupt this party.
Constitutional law aspects will have a role to play in this (notably the
principle of proportionality, which I think off the cuff has not previously
been applied to restitution claims), but it is nevertheless remarkable
what restitution law can do to a country and to one of its two main political
parties.
Gerhard Dannemann
-- <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |