![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
Two
new judgements coming from Courts of Appeal are recently appear on the
French Law of unjustified enrichment: 1. One of the Court of Appeal of Nîmes (28 Jan. 1999) consider
that unjustified enrichment created between two homosexual concubines
finds her legal cause in «the will of two women to continue the common
life» (decision which appears in the review "Semaine juridique,
general edition, March 8 2000, No 10, IVe party, No 1432");
2. The other come from the Court of Appeal of Nancy, which have
consider that «the downward which himself be occupied to its sick
mother until its death» its not allowed to claim the unjustified
enrichment by the inheritance of the de cujus, because the profit of the
died mother has its legal cause in «the affection relationships which
link the two person» (decision with appears in the review "Semaine
juridique, general edition, February 16 2000, No 7-8, IVe party, No
1306).
The two judgements seem in contradiction with dominant
jurisprudence coming from the Supreme Court (v. in particular Cour de
cassation: civ. ch. 1, Oct. 15, 1996, Revue trimestielle de droit civil
1997, p. 102, note HAUSER; civ. ch. 1, July 12, 1994, Recueil Dalloz 1995,
J, p. 623, note TCHENDJOU.
Dr. Christian P. FILIOS (Ph.D.)
<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |