![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
In
many jurisdictions even unliquidated debts are provable in bankruptcy. (In
fact, I think I am right in saying that Australia is quite unusual in imposing
a general bar against unliquidated claims.) At least in Canada, however,
you need a liquidated debt to have standing to petition the debtor into
bankruptcy. Similarly to the decision mentioned by Mark Armstrong, it was
recently held (Re
207053 Alberta Ltd (1998) 233 Alta Rep 313; 7 Can Bankr Rep (4th) 32;
[1999] RLR §76) that a claim in unjust enrichment could satisfy this requirement.
Lionel
Readers might like to note the decision of the Supreme
Court of New South Wales in Cashflow Finance Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking
Corporation; COD Factors Australia Pty Ltd v Cashflow Finance Pty Ltd
(In Liq); Star v Klyon Pty Ltd; COD Factors Australia Pty Ltd v Walters
(judgement 14 May 1999)(LEXIS). One of the many issues (including, for
example, constructive trusts and tracing) raised in this case is the
question of whether or not an obligation to make restitution is one
which is provable in liquidation (a post-liquidation obligation)? Justice
Einstein answered the question in the affirmative:" A claim for restitution
of money paid to or to the use of a person who has become bankrupt is
a claim which is provable in a bankruptcy, because it is a liquidated
demand". Mark <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |