![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
Two new publications:
First, "Lessons from the Swaps Litigation" edited by
Peter Birks and Francis Rose, published by LLP.
Secondly, my own contribution: Gerard McMeel, "The Modern
Law of Restitution", published by Blackstone Press (who will be characteristically
generous with Inspection Copies for Lecturers).
Briefly on the practical implications of Dimond
v Lovell, my understanding is that the UK Director General of Fair
Trading is quite favourable towards the help hire industry (as indeed
was the House of Lords in the 1994 case of Giles v Thompson). Therefore
many of them are now licensed to carry on this kind of business. The problems
arise out of an earlier batch of cases where nobody had thought them to
be consumer credit agreements, before our car insurers started taking
the point. Dimond may adversely affect earlier cases, but these are teething
troubles, rather than the end of industry. I could personally never see
how restitution could be relevant to these cases.
---------------------- <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |