Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
Francis Rose
Date:
Sun, 6 Aug 2000 17:19:53 +0100
Re:
Resulting Trusts and Equitable Compensation

 

From the Mansfield Press / LLP
(details from: sarah.tigwell@informa.com)

 

RESTITUTION and EQUITY: vol. 1: RESULTING TRUSTS AND EQUITABLE COMPENSATION

Edited by Peter Birks and Francis Rose

Foreword by Lord Justice Mummery

PART I: RESULTING TRUSTS
1.. On the nature of resulting trusts: the Vandervell litigation revisited (Edwin Simpson)
2.. On the classification of trusts (Nicholas McBride)
3.. Resulting trusts: a rather limited doctrine (Charles Rickett and Ross Grantham)
4.. A hard look at Hodgson v Marks (William Swadling)
5.. Quistclose and resulting trusts (Jennifer Payne)
6.. Resulting trusts and illegality (Graham Virgo and Janet O'Sullivan)
7.. Dispositions involving fiduciaries: the equity to rescind and the resulting trust (Richard Nolan)
8.. Resulting trusts and the conflict of laws (Robert Stevens)
9.. Mansfield Symposium on resulting trusts: reporter's note (Charles Harpum)

PART II: EQUITABLE COMPENSATION
10.. Compensation for loss in equity: choosing the right horse for each course (Charles Rickett)
11.. Undue influence and equitable compensation (Lusina Ho)
12.. Apportioning liability for trust losses (Charles Mitchell)
13.. Equitable compensation and the regulation of fiduciary relationships (Joshua Getzler)

Epilogue (Peter Birks)

APPENDICES
1.. Restitution and resulting trusts (Peter Birks) (reprinted from S Goldstein (ed), Equity and Contemporary Legal Developments)
2.. A new role for resulting trusts (William Swadling) (reprinted from (1996) 16 LS 110.


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !