Constructive trust (Ellingsen v Hallmark) (Andrew Tettenborn, 30 Sep 2000)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Andrew Tettenborn
Date:	Sat, 30 Sep 2000 20:00:58 +0100
Re:	Constructive trust (Ellingsen v Hallmark)

*What* obligation was the ownership retained to secure? Not the duty to repay the purchase money loan, because ex hypothesi there wasn't one. Nor, arguably, the duty to find finance: I'd have thought if the buyer couldn't find finance the whole deal would be off. And if these are ruled out, I can't see any other candidates. Or am I being purblind?

Andrew Tettenborn
Bracton Professor of Law

Snailmail:
Dept of Law
Amory Building
Rennes Drive
University of Exeter
Exeter EX4 4RJ
England

Tel: (+44)(0)1392-263189
Office Fax: (+44)(0)1392-263196
Personal Fax: (+44)(0)870-284-1426

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.