Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
Gordon Goldberg
Date:
Wed, 4 Oct 2000 18:20:53 +0100
Re:
Constructive trust (Ellingsen v Hallmark)

 

I neglected previously to point out that the "defensible outcome" in the situation covered by Bowen, L.J.'s assertion could be achieved by an action for mesne profits. If I remember the relevant statute, this action would today, survive against the trespasser's estate, as would an action for trespass against the taker of the horse in Lord Mansfield's example.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Gordon Goldberg
Date: 04 October 2000 17:27
Subject: Re: RDG: Constructive trust (Ellingsen v Hallmark)

When he claims that Lord Ellenborough, C.J., specifically rejected a ratification theory in his judgment in Taylor v. Plumer, is Lionel referring to the last sentence of his Lordship's judgment? If so, I endeavoured in [2000] R.L.R. at 213 (in n.157 and its accompanying text) to explain that sentence's relationship to his Lordship's acceptance arguendo of ratification as the basis of waiver of tort, which I had quoted ibid. at 210.


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !