![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
Regarding the judge's question in Durrani v. Augier: I seem to recall that, at least in matrimonial (and perhaps in all) causes when I was first in practice in Victoria, Australia, a party was not allowed in his own person to effect service of process. He had to employ his solicitor or a licensed process server to do so. Perhaps a similar rule might have thwarted Augier's scheme? <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |