Cass's trustee in bankruptcy (Allan Axelrod, 15 Dec 2000)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Allan Axelrod
Date:	Fri, 15 Dec 2000 11:12:01 -0500
Re:	Cass's trustee in bankruptcy

Lionel Smith wrote:

Mark Armstrong-Cerfontaine wrote:
(9) Therefore, to answer conclusively whether section 339 IA 1986 applies, one must determine the extent to which the money misappropriated by Cass was his money/property.

I agree and I think this is, as they say around here, the $64,000 question.

in 1996, there was a group discussion of preference avoidance where the bankrupt had improperly acquired the money paid out: the head was DEFENSES

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.