![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
Presumably
a casino will not be registered as a charity for tax purposes. A gift on
the other hand is a disposition of property other than for valuable consideration.
If I place a bet, pay money to the casino and get no right to sue for recovery
of my winnings if I choose the right numbers on the roulette, I have given
away my money for nothing (legally enforceable) in return. Hence a gift.
-----Original Message----- Lionel Smith wrote:
Here is a question for anyone interested, especially
insolvency buffs. In Lipkin Gorman v. Karpnale (let's say it all together:
[1991] 2 AC 548) the rogue Cass misappropriated money of the plaintiff
and gambled it away at the casino operated by the defendant. One crucial
element in the plaintiff's success was that under English gaming law,
the gambling transactions were treated as executed gifts so that the
defendant could not claim to be a good faith purchaser for value.
=======================
under a US statute called something like
the 'religious liberty' act, good-faith charitable gifts by an insolvent
are not avoidable
a court able to describe a loss to a
casino as a 'gift' should have little trouble recognizing a casino as
a 'charity'
******* For further information about Clifford Chance please
see our website at http://www.cliffordchance.com
or refer to any Clifford Chance office. <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |