![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
a US case
in re chomakos [allard v flamingo hilton] 69 f3 769 1995 holds that a casino
gives reasonably equivalent value when it offers the insolvent a win prospect
even though the casino games have a built-in house advantage of up to ten
percent
[incidentally the house percentage can be improved by
getting the bettor drunk, which is not against the US casino free-drink
policy]
the insolvent would be well advised to keep gambling
until she either wins herself back to solvency or loses all non-exempt
assets
query an insolvent who has invested heavily in the english
national lottery: i believe it returns well under 50% to the bettors,
altho use of proceeds for culture might fit the US charity exception ??? <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |