Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index        Next message ==>
Sender:
Andrew Tettenborn
Date:
Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:38:12 +0100
Re:
Change of position

 

Jason Neyers suggests that it may be wrong

to view change of position as a defence to an otherwise valid claim in unjust enrichment rather than as a constituent part of the cause of action itself.

Also, that one might instead say that

a person is enriched if, and only if, the transferred value is still retained

As I understand the rules on pleading actions in unjust enrichment, it is enough for a claimant to show that the defendant was enriched by receipt of a benefit at the claimant's expense, and there is no need for the claimant to show that the defendant is still enriched at the time of his action, although it may be to his advantage to do so if the value surviving in the defendant's hands is greater than the value received and he wishes to claim the larger sum (cf Jones v Jones).

There's a further difficulty with saying that you aren't enriched in so far as you haven't still got whatever it was enriched you. What do you do about the person who has changed his position in bad faith, and how do you differentiate him from the good faith big spender? To say the former is enriched but the latter isn't lands you in the realm of pure fiction. To say that neither is enriched but the bad faith position-changer is treated as if he were is not much more satisfactory. The only logical way to look at it is the old-fashioned one: both are enriched, but there's a very good reason not to make the good faith position-changer cough up.

AMT

Andrew Tettenborn MA LLB
Bracton Professor of Law

Tel: 01392-263189 / +44-392-263189 (international)
Fax: 01392-263196 / +44-392-263196 (international)
Personal Fax: 0870-0889339 / +44-870-0889339 (international)

Snailmail: School of Law,
University of Exeter,
Amory Building,
Rennes Drive,
Exeter EX4 4RJ
England

[ Homepage: http://www.ex.ac.uk/law/ ].


<== Previous message       Back to index        Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !