South African case (Hector MacQueen, 6 Apr 2001)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Hector MacQueen
Date:	Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:38:46
Re:	South African case

Interesting decision of the South African Supreme Court of Appeal, McCarthy Retail Ltd v Shortdistance Carriers CC, decided 16 March 2001, can be found at

http://www.uovs.ac.za/faculties/law/appeals/16032001McC1.htm

Court discusses general enrichment action, improvements and indirect enrichment. Judgment also blessedly short and clear.

Hector MacQueen

Professor of Private Law
University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh EH8 9YL
UK
Tel (UK)-0131-650-2060/2009
Fax (UK)-0131-650-6317

Editor Edinburgh Law Review

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.