Restitution Discussion Group Archives
| Sender: |
Steve Hedley |
| Date: |
Fri, 18 May 2001 07:13:35 +0100 |
| Re: |
Recent cases |
I have recently added the following to the England and
Wales page of my Restitution site (www.law.cam.ac.uk/restitution/):
BSkyB v. Customs
Commissioners Casio v. Sayo Customs Commissioners
v. Cresta Holidays Eastbourne
Borough Council v. Foster Wilson v. First
County Trust The last has only a relatively tenuous connection with
restitution, but I have included it because the main point in the case
is of general private law relevance. It concerns a declaration that significant
parts of the Consumer Protection legislation are incompatible with the
creditor's human rights.
Steve Hedley
=========================================== telephone and answering machine : (01223) 334931 Christ's College Cambridge CB2 3BU
(Adm Ct, 23 February 2001, the Woolwich principle)
(CA, 11 April 2000, dishonest assistance and conflicts)
(CA, 20 February 2001, repayment of tax)
(QBD, 20 December 2000, ultra vires payment)
(CA, 2 May 2001, Consumer Credit Act and Human Rights)
FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE
messages : (01223) 334900
fax : (01223) 334967
===========================================
<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>
»
»
»
»
| For
editorial policy, see here. For the unedited archive, see here. The archive editor is Steve Hedley. |
