Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index        Next message ==>
Sender:
Lionel Smith
Date:
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 15:03:55 -0400
Re:
Disgorgement & company law

 

CMS DOLPHIN LIMITED v SIMONET (23 May 2001, L Collins J) is a fairly typical case of leaving the company and trying to take the customers along. It is interesting for a discussion of how to deal with the situation where the gain is made not by the breaching fiduciary but by a company he controls (paras 98-105, accepting effectively knowing assistance and also knowing receipt as grounds for the gain-based claim against the company). Also, the last section (called Remedies ...) covers some details of the taking of the account, considers election, and also reveals that the judge would have applied Blake (for breach of the contract of employment) had he thought it necessary.

Lionel


<== Previous message       Back to index        Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !