Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
Andrew Tettenborn
Date:
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:59:44
Re:
Change of position and liability incurred

 

A nice case in the CA last Nov (I don't think it's been picked up on RDG yet): how do you deal with change of position where a liability is incurred but not yet paid?

In Pearce v Lloyds Bank (Casetrack, 23/11/01), Fraudster buys gold bullion for £90k from Pearce, a jeweller, by causing a forged transfer into Pearce's account at Lloyds of that amount (all amounts approx). The bullion has been bought for £90k by Pearce (ie no profit on the deal), but he buys VAT free for £80k, being in due course accountable to Customs for the £10k VAT element. Pearce is running on a shoestring, and Customs eventually get their £10k from him 5 years later. The balloon duly goes up, and Lloyds claims to debit Pearce's account by £90k. Writs fly.

Pearce is held entitled to change of position re £80k: no problems. But what about the £10k? Pearce says he's entitled to have the whole entry reversed as at the time of transfer into his account (and hence he shouldn't have to pay o/d interest on the 10k). Lloyds say, No: pay interest until you actually paid Customs, since otherwise you get a free five-year o/d of £10k from us. CA say: Lloyds are right, and can charge him interest, provided they accept liability for the £10k as and when paid.

Is this the best way to deal with the problem? It seems harsh that you get no relief for an item which appears on your balance sheet straight away. Also, Pearce is effectively forced to give credit to Lloyds - OK perhaps with a bank, but not necessarily where the payer is less solid.

For these reasons, might a better way be to give Pearce relief immediately for his liability to Customs, subject to a deduction for interest between the time the £10k was credited to Pearce and the time he paid it over to Customs?

Any thoughts?

Andrew

Andrew Tettenborn MA LLB
Bracton Professor of Law

Tel: 01392-263189 / +44-392-263189 (international)
Mobile: 07813-478102
Fax: 01392-263196 / +44-392-263196 (international)

Snailmail: School of Law,
University of Exeter,
Amory Building,
Rennes Drive,
Exeter EX4 4RJ
England

[ Homepage: http://www.ex.ac.uk/law/ ].


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !