![]() |
RDG online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
The Queensland Court of Appeal has recently allowed an
appeal from a decision the details of which I posted to this group some
months ago. It deals with resulting trusts and whether a restitutionary
remedy is available where money is paid to an agent then paid out on instructions,
whether the defence of change of position is available and whether in
paying the money out the agent was acting to its detriment on the faith
of the receipt.
The judgment can be found at:
http://www.courts.qld.gov.au/qjudgment/ca02_151.htm
It's in a pdf file under the name:
Port
of Brisbane Corp v. ANZ Securities [2002] QCA 158 (01/1159) (McPherson
JA Davies JA Mullins J 10/05/2002 18 pages)
It deals with the following decisions:
Australia and New Zealand Banking Corporation v Westpac
Banking Corporation (1988) 164 CLR 662, applied
Barnes v Addy (1874) 9 Ch App 386, applied
Baylis v Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch 127, considered
Black v Freedman (1910) 12 CLR 105, applied
Consul Development Pty Limited v DPC Estates Pty Ltd
(1975) 132 CLR 373, applied
Currie v Misa (1875) LR 10 Ex D 153, applied
Daly v Sydney Stock Exchange (1986) 160 CLR 371,
followed
David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
(1992) 175 CLR 353, followed
James v Oxley (1939) 61 CLR 433, distinguished
Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548,
applied
Lurgi (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sandess Pty Ltd [2000]
VSC 278, applied
Moses v Macferlan (1770) 2 Burr 1005, considered
Parsons v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 615, considered
Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987) 162 CLR
32, considered
Perel v Australian Bank of Commerce (1923) 24
SR (NSW) 62, considered
Pollard v Bank of England (1871) LR 6 QB 623,
applied
R v Vinogradoff [1935] WN 68, applied
Sinclair v Brougham [1914] AC 398, considered
State Bank of New South Wales Ltd v Swiss Bank Corporation
(1995) 39 NSWLR 350, distinguished
Tresize v National Australia Bank Ltd (1994) 30
FCR 134, applied
United States Surgical Corporation v Hospital Products
International Pty Ltd [1983] 2 NSWLR 157, applied
Westdeutsche Bank v Islington Local Borough Council
[1996] AC 669, distinguished
-- <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |